Beyond 32nm: the future of processors revealed

25th Jul 2009 | 15:36

Beyond 32nm: the future of processors revealed

IBM has a 28nm one, Intel has a 32nm one. Where will it end?

28nm is just around the corner

Big news. The IBM Technology Alliance has announced its 28nm process and the first chips should be rolling off the lines by 2010 with ARM systems-on-a-chip (SoC) among the first. Are you excited? Yes? No? At the very least you should be impressed.

Despite endless predictions of insurmountable technical hurdles the semiconductor business has continued to trace Moore's predictions and are now rapidly heading towards the weird world of nanoelectronics.

Small is good

Using a smaller nanometre process is a Very Good Thing. It means lower power consumption, higher potential frequencies and, of course, more transistors, all good stuff.

The best of AMD and Intel's processors currently use a 45nm process and Intel announced its 32nm Westmere processors in February for delivery before the end of the year. AMD currently seems to be about a year behind Intel, which makes IBM's announcement impressive stuff.

Semiconductors are created using photolithography, the design etched in light and chemically processed, simply rinse and repeat until you've built your chip up in layers. The trick to shrinking the design is getting an accurate beam onto your wafer and it is this process that has largely been the focus of the boffins, along with improved dielectric materials to stop electrons getting ideas of their own and wandering off track.

193nm lasers

The current tool of choice for tracing out your transistors is an argon-flouride deep ultraviolet excimer laser with a 193nm wavelength (mmmm nice). Now, how can you possibly make a 32nm process chip using a laser beam 193nm wide I hear you ask? Surely this is like using a JCB for weeding your borders? Two key technologies have recently emerged.

First, there's double patterning. In its simplest form this process uses two exposures, offset slightly to create features smaller than either exposure could create alone, effectively increasing the resolution by a factor of two.

You don't have to stop there either, triple and quadruple patterning is possible. Second, we have a process called immersion lithography, where the beam is shone thorough a liquid, this deflects and slows the beam and effectively gives you a resolution increase equal to the refractive index of the liquid, for water this is 1.44. Research into new liquids with refractive indices of 1.7 or more will increase the further.

Intel's Westmere employs immersion lithography on 'critical' layers. Combine these methods and you've turned your relatively clumsy beam into something much more accurate without any major changes in technology and, more importantly, completely rebuilding ridiculously expensive fabs.

The limits of photolithography have been announced as nearly reached many times, beyond one micron was once thought impossible, and yet each time the white-coated ones manage to squeeze higher resolutions out of it.

Why not just use a finer beam in the first place? An obvious solution and a lot of hard cash has been spent trying it, including using X-rays and focused ion and electron beams. Intel had high hopes for the 157nm laser, but problems with building suitable lenses have scuppered it for the time being.

One current front runner is the extreme ultraviolet laser with a wavelength of 13.5nm. So far though the high-power beam has proved too much for the current materials, causing a lot of collateral damage.

The semiconductor roadmap

All the small things

When can we expect the results of all this trickery? Look no further than the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS), which offers the industry's best guess. It predicts three more processes: 22nm, 16nm and 11nm. Chips using 22nm process are scheduled at around 2011. These will use similar techniques to the existing 32nm process.

It's predicted that this may be the limit for current planar designs however, and it might be necessary to build the gates vertically on what are termed 'fins'. Experimental 22nm SRAM chips are in the labs now. The 16nm process is expected before 2018, although Intel reckons it will be there by 2013. New problems will arise, including excessive quantum tunnelling.

This is where things get a bit weird as materials stop dancing to the rules of classical physics and Schrödinger's wave-equation pops up. Basically, it gets hard to stop the electrons breaching a barrier that's only a few nanometres thick no matter what material you use. This is also at the edge of commercial fabrication, nothing can currently be consistently and reliably made this small.

Toshiba has built a prototype memory module with 15nm lines, but such sizes are still lab experiments. Next stop on the ladder down is the 11nm process, predicted for 2022 by the ITRS, although, again, Intel is more buoyant and talks of 2015.

This is the expected limit of CMOS and may well mean silicon chips are no longer silicon. At this level dielectric thickness could be down to one atom, making it difficult to keep anything going where you want it to go.

It is also expected to be the end for conventional photolithography, etching and polishing methods. After 11nm the roadmap has yet to be drawn, it appears that this is as far as current technologies can take us. Possible ways of making even smaller and more powerful chips include three dimensional arrays, using nanowires and tubes, single electron devices, spinbased computing, photonics and any number of other weird and wonderful ideas.

Whichever proves the most commercial will win, business being business. Until then though, the good times will continue to roll, Moore is still right and chips will continue to shrink.


First published in PC Format Issue 228

Liked this? Then check out How to overclock the Core i7

Sign up for TechRadar's free Weird Week in Tech newsletter
Get the oddest tech stories of the week, plus the most popular news and reviews delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up at

Follow TechRadar on Twitter

Share this Article

Most Popular

Edition: UK
TopView classic version